Royalty, dividends, corporate income tax, petroleum produc

Since the statement by the Government on the 40% fuel price increase on 4th June 2008, much commotion has been happening in Malaysia. I am much inclined on the recent issue, where chain mail and various blogs are relentlessly attacking and making baseless and inaccurate allegation towards our national oil company, PETRONAS. A lot of people are questioning on PETRONAS role, function and contribution to the country especially on the money that it has provided to the government.

For the record, here’s the fact:

  1. PETRONAS is essentially a company, a business entity, which operates on a commercial manner. Therefore, its main objective would be to generate income and value for its shareholder (which is the Government).
  2. The Government gave RM10 million to PETRONAS as seed capital in 1974, when PETRONAS was set up. I supposed, this is merely peanut figure as opposed to other projects.
  3. PETRONAS made RM570 billion in accumulated profits (from 1974 to 2007), and returned to the Government a total of RM335.7 billion. That is about 65% of the profits - meaning for every RM1 that PETRONAS makes, 65 sen goes back to the Government.
  4. Last year, PETRONAS made a pre-tax profit of RM86.8 billion. The amount given back to the Government (in royalty, dividends, corporate income tax, petroleum products income tax and export duty) was RM52.3 billion. The rest of the profit was used to pay off minority interests and taxes in foreign countries (Yes! PETRONAS now operates in more than 30 countries), and the remaining figures was reinvested. The amount reinvested seems a lot, but the oil and gas industry is technology- and capital-intensive. Costs have gone up exponentially in the last couple of years. Previously, to drill a well, it cost about US$3 million; now it costs US$7 million. The use of rigs was US$200,000 a day a couple of years ago; now it costs US$600,000 a day.
  5. A lot of people also do not realise that the amount returned by PETRONAS to the Government makes up 35% of the Government’s total annual income, to be used by the Government for expenditures, development, operations, and yes, for the various subsidies. That means for every RM1 the Government makes, 35 sen is contributed by PETRONAS.

So, instead of asking what happens to PETRONAS’ money or profits, people should be questioning how the money paid by PETRONAS to the Government is allocated.

Note: PETRONAS President cum CEO will be on TV1 at 0930pm tonight so stay tuned.

You may also like...
Comments
10 comments have been left so far »
  1. sarkozy
    June 17, 2008

    I agree that Petronas is a well run company.The recent oil price increase has nothing to do with them.It is the hypocritical government who is responsible for this fracas.They talk about having to minimising the subsidies so that the countries revenue isn’t reduced yet have wasted money on the Port Klang Free Zone,Monsoon Cup,F1,Angkasawan mission,closed tenders(open tenders would give better prices)……Anwar ibrahim has defended Petronas and says that he has spoken with some executives are fed up with the way of the government.I admit that the subsidies cant go on forever and it is costing our country heaps of money because the country would be losing out on potential revenue if the subsidised oil was to be sold at market price elsewhere.So I suggest a subsidy only for the lower income earners.Positive class discrimination.Which should apply to all national policies actually,none of that racist racial discrimination we face.

    [Reply]

    Terry reply on June 19, 2008 1:59 pm:

    Sarkozy, I agree with you

    [Reply]

    Leave a reply
  2. Kay
    June 18, 2008

    U know Ter…i was thinking bila lah ko mo ckp something about the recent price hike.

    [Reply]

    Terry reply on June 19, 2008 2:01 pm:

    sorry Kay, I have to tapis some of you comment for sensitivity reasons :)

    [Reply]

    Leave a reply
  3. edna
    June 19, 2008

    yah me too. especially since the petronas keep on popping nearly everywhere. newstand, tv, radio. ni mesti somebody would be bengang by now.

    [Reply]

    Terry reply on June 19, 2008 2:06 pm:

    Ed, I guess the real issue here is people don’t have enough disposable income to play with since the petrol increase thus looking other places to blame. But frankly, I don’t favor subsidies. I would recommend money management to mitigate the price increases.

    [Reply]

    Leave a reply
  4. Kay
    June 19, 2008

    oh hehe..ok..ok..sorry bos. :D

    [Reply]

    Terry reply on June 19, 2008 5:07 pm:

    hehehe - ko tau la dunia sekarang ni - going crazy :p

    [Reply]

    Leave a reply
  5. Julian
    June 19, 2008

    ada kerja kosong ka di petronas??? ehehehehe…

    actually abolish subsidies… then gahmen should also abolish excise duty and lower income tax etc…

    [Reply]

    Terry reply on June 19, 2008 5:10 pm:

    Jules, I agree with you. They need to abolish the exercise duties, reduce the income tax and best of all, reduce that imported car tax.

    note: i guess there are lots of vacancies as most have moved to Middle East to get higher pay - try applying laa.

    [Reply]

    Leave a reply
Leave a Comment
Add your picture!
Join Gravatar and upload your avatar. C'mon, it's free!